Knowledge Is Power
- All About Muhammad
- Answering Infidels
- Answering Islam
- Explore the Qur'an
- Counter Terrorism
- FaithFreedom International
- Games Muslims Play
- Global Incident Map
- History of Jihad
- In The Name Of Allah
- Investigate Islam
- Islam: Truth or Myth?
- Islamic Attacks -Past 2 Months
- Kosovo In The 80's
- Masada2000.org
- Middle East Facts
- AhmadsQuran
- Myths of Islam
- PRISM
- Rational Thinking
- SaveKosovo.Org
- Skeptic's Annotated Quran
- Taqiyya and Kitman
- Terrorism Awareness Project
- Terror WHY?
- Things That Offend Muslims
- Things You Should Know About Islam
- USC-MSA Compendium of Muslim Texts
- Why Bad Beliefs Don't Die
- WikiIslam
Complete List of Congressional Emails & Fax Numbers
View the Muhammad Cartoons
Muslims want you to make way for Islam, but Islam does not make way for you.
The government insists that you respect Islam, but Islam has no respect for you.
Islam wants to rule, submit, and seeks to destroy our western civilization.
In 1945, Nazism was defeated in Europe. In 1989, Communism was defeated in Europe.
Now the Islamic ideology has to be defeated.
Stop Islamisation.
Defend our freedom.
~Geert Wilders' "Fitna" View "Fitna" at LiveLeak
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein belong to each individual author, contributor or commenter and do not reflect the opinions of any other individual author, contributor or commenter. Simple, no?
© Copyright 2009
« 
»
Previous: 
Next: 
Comment Meta:
XHTML:
More Options ...
Categories
Tag Cloud
Blog RSS
Comments RSS
Last 50 Posts
9:46 am - November 18th, 2008
Not listed: The fact any opposing viewpoints were scrubbed or the person who disagreed was attacked by the brainwashed lizardoids and then banned.
I don’t judge a blog on whether or not it agrees with me on every point. I do judge a blog that imposes its view without allowing polite dissent or alternative views. I mean, why have a public blog if you won’t allow debate?
9:50 am - November 18th, 2008
Oh, I forgot to add:
Also the fact Charles is a coward who bans someone and then lies about why he banned the person who is unable to defend him/herself.
10:09 am - November 18th, 2008
Hey DJM, check out lgf, Charlie Manson and his family are having a meltdown about the censorship awards.
10:19 am - November 18th, 2008
You just know that there are hundreds of LGF readers looking at that thread and having to sit on their hands. They know damn well that only certain opinions are welcome. No matter how polite or reasonable you try to express yourself, certain viewpoints are verboten over there.
10:25 am - November 18th, 2008
Exceller, Charles likes the weak minded much easier to control. Whats sad is they stay there knowing full well that they can’t say certain things. They are swarming like bees in that thread.
10:31 am - November 18th, 2008
CowardKerry - Lol! Sometimes the most potent weapon is truth. Notice he once again lies in suggesting (without giving anyone the opportunity of rebuttal) that everyone here is a “racist” and were banned for “supporting fascists.”
In fact, Charles, and anyone else from LGF reading this, I was banned for posting ONE link out of dozens that Charles didn’t like. And my second account was blocked for politely pointing out that up until that point, I had been a loyal lizard.
exceller - Absolutely. They know if they complain about the censorship, even respectfully, they’ll be banned and labeled a “racist” or for “supporting fascists.”
10:51 am - November 18th, 2008
The brown-nosing on the “censorship” thread is incredible. I was banned last week, with no explanation, for I guess dinging Charles or one of his pets down on one of the STUPID intelligent design mockfests. Banning Mama Winger-WTF?
11:28 am - November 18th, 2008
While there, I noticed Killgore the religious bigot has dredged up something about Texas professors being 99% against the teaching of ID in the curriculum. I didn’t stay long enough to read it and barely glanced at the title.
The only thing that this proves is Ben Stein was right; who wouldn’t say that if they feared for their livelihood which is exactly what is happening in the academia circles if you reject evolution as a whole? How many examples must be shown on the big screen before the leaders “of free speech” at LGF recognize their own hypocrisy?
There was a time that 99% represented a magic number of fraud in a vote. Like fear and suppression? Remember Saddam’s 99.5% landslide or Yasser’s 99% election victory? Those were trotted out at LGF daily - and everyone knew they were bogus results. But not now. Not when it’s your pet issue.
Something else. What Charles and the always moronic Killgore invariably fail to mention is that poll after poll overwhelmingly shows the general public wanting something as alternative taught in conjunction with evolution. Call the alternative what you will.
But the fact remains, Charles and Killgore the bigot are not in the vast majority as they wish to believe.
2:26 pm - November 18th, 2008
Tex you aren’t being objective. 99% of doctors would probably say that Ebola was deadly, that doesn’t mean that Ebola isn’t deadly. Sometimes “99%” is a magic number implying that a thing is fraudulent, sometimes it’s a magic number implying that everyone simply agrees.
I’m agnostic on the whole evolution/creationist biz. Personally, I only care about what works. If believing in the Giant Spaghetti Monster would get us more vaccines, I’d go for that too.
2:46 pm - November 18th, 2008
I voted for the “Anti God” option, but I also agree with reasons stated in posts #1, 2, and 4 above!
DJM, me too- after I posted links to sites with information against Darwinism, next time I tried logging into LGF, I was confronted with a box that says “that account is now blocked.”
I hardly ever posted at LGF anyhow. I lurked most of the time.
When I did post, it was not often, and I was a pretty polite person.
I avoided all the threads at LGF about European political parties, Neo Nazis, and racism, mostly because such topics did not interest me.
6:25 pm - November 18th, 2008
Hey DJM I am sorry you did not like the poll. What options would you have?
7:01 am - November 19th, 2008
I liked the poll, I just would have added the things I mentioned in comment #1 & #2
For the record, I’m not so much mad about being banned from LGF. Its not my blog and Charles can ban whoever he wants for whatever reason he wants. My complaint is that Charles then LIES about why he banned certain people, even going as far as libeling them, when he knows they cannot respond in the same forum. That’s just cowardly and dishonest.
8:46 am - November 19th, 2008
Eggggzactly.
8:57 am - November 19th, 2008
DJM said:
“Oh, I forgot to add:
Also the fact Charles is a coward who bans someone and then lies about why he banned the person who is unable to defend him/herself.”
DLM, this is exactly correct. Set aside his philosophical crusades; this is by far my biggest beef with CJ: I expected that after Rathergate, he would be a caped crusader for the truth. When he directly lied on LGF about several things regarding me and my family, committed libel in doing so, and when provided with the facts showed no inclination to consider that he may have been wrong, he showed that he is as trustworthy as a rattlesnake. The most offensive thing is that due to his “reputation” for straight shooting, he has his minions believing his lies about individuals
This is not hyperbole: At root, either through negligently gross sloppiness or through the direct lie, he is using the same technique at root as Goebbels. No, CJ doesn’t = Hitler. Yes, CJ = Goebbels in technique. Free speech cannot do its clarifying work when subjected to a totalitarian corrupting censorship engendered by blog ownership.
Food for thought.